Unacceptable conduct
I am one of a group of people who signed up to complete autism diagnostic training with this organisation.
Initially, I expressed interest and then assumed that as I am not a healthcare professional (nor even a teacher) that I wouldn’t be eligible. However, a telephone call from Jude soon changed my mind because he said he’d checked with his colleague and they wanted to offer me a place. As someone who is deeply passionate about the current crisis surrounding autism diagnostics, I was too thrilled and excited to realise how naive I was being. The phone call was of such a nature that I rushed home and paid immediately; I was told that places were extremely limited, led to believe that the training was an exclusive opportunity, and told that I’d be offered a placement on completion of my masters degree. I messaged my whole family excitedly telling them exactly this because it’s what I’d just been told. On this basis, I paid the fee within an hour or so of receiving the phone call because I didn’t want to risk losing a place.
The training itself was absolutely fantastic. I cannot fault it. However, upon completion, the members of my cohort slowly started to realise that we weren’t going to be able to use our training easily at all because most of us are not HCPC registered. During the training we were assured that this shouldn’t and wouldn’t matter, but it evidently does in practice and there’s no escaping that.
As time went on and we received either radio silence or bad news (ie ‘we ask you to be HCPC registered’) from the various diagnostic centres we approached for experience, it dawned on us that we’d spent almost £1000 apiece on a qualification hardly any of us can use. Many of us tried to reach out to Jude and the course facilitator, but most of us received no response.
Jude did respond to one email sent as a group with a phone call to the cohort member who sent it. That call ultimately amounted to, “Nothing was ever guaranteed and it’s very quiet right now with very low demand for assessments, so give it time and we’ll be in touch if anything becomes available.” Of course, this is what we were told while the course continued to be advertised for further cohorts on the basis of extremely high demand. The fact remains that several of us WERE given the very strong impression that post-training opportunities definitely awaited us, notably these assurances being made via voice note or phone call and never in writing. Those of us who were not given this impression felt pressured in other ways, eg limited places, limited time, limited opportunity, use the qualification right away to make a difference in the midst of extremely high demand for assessors etc. These were high pressure sales tactics based on an emotional connection with the subject matter at hand, and yes, many of us absolutely do feel taken advantage of.
We were initially going to go back to Jude as a group with a number of questions via email, and our member did follow up the phone call with a very polite and pleasant email to try and re-establish a positive rapport and continue a dialogue, but this went unacknowledged. Consequently, the group concluded that following up with questions regarding our concerns ultimately wouldn’t be adequately addressed and that we’d just be given the same boilerplate justification and sent on our way.
This course needs a much more rigorous admissions policy and REALISTIC eligibility for actually being able to use the qualification made abundantly clear from the outset, with the organisation rightly refusing places to those who don’t meet the criteria for the qualification to be functional rather than taking their money anyway and leaving them with no recourse whatsoever beyond leaving TrustPilot reviews. The whole point of us joining was to make a difference to the countless families desperately waiting for assessment, and we’ve paid almost £1000 for a digital certificate and the privilege of not being able to help a single person.
Edit to respond to organisation:
When the words “We’ll give you a placement” are used in a pre-purchase phone call alongside allusions to how well you know/understand the customer and how much they want to make a difference, it instils a false confidence and trust in that customer. You are perfectly aware that this is what happened. It is very clear from the reviews that this feeling is a consensus amongst multiple people, which doesn’t happen without some error on your part. The right thing to do is to acknowledge that multiple reviews echo very similar experiences and that this indicates a problem you can’t explain away with a template justification.
3 October 2025
Unprompted review