Flirtingmilfs Reviews 2

This website is only for FLIRTING. EVERY SINGLE PROFILE Shows a message that clearly states there is no physical contact. This is true. If you want to pay £1 to text someone a bulshite message and think it will get a meetup GO AHEAD. waste of money. I took screen prints of one profile picture being used multiple times as different people.....to contact me.
Use your money somewhere else

Flirtingmilfs is one of those contacts for sex sites that pop up all over the net and promise you that the most beautiful (and desperate) woman in your city is just waiting for your message to have sex with you. Well, what is the truth to that?
We are a small group consisting of an AI researcher, a Psychologist, and a journalist for a British man's magazine. In order o find out what this site has to offer and if there is any truth to their claims we created four profiles of men, three in London and one in Edinburgh, all with the same text but different pictures - one famous actor who died ten years ago, a handsome, well-to-do 50-year-old, a 35-year-old large man, and the picture of a homeless man of undetermined age. We let those ads run for about four weeks, only checking in every now and then before getting to the fun part.
The dead actor (A) and the well-to-do man (B) got marginally more hits than the other two (3,508/3,361), whilst C and D just came in under 2,800. Right from the start, we identified that 90% of the women replying to the London guy and claiming to live there also were replying to the Edinburgh ad, also living in that city. With a few exceptions, the messages were identical in every way down to the time stamp, as were the attached pictures. In 70% of the cases, we are certain that a bot has sent the responses out, the others might have been done by employees. Over 80% were clearly written by men and aimed to catch the attention of the recipient with clear sexual meanings. We responded to some of the messages we got and it became pretty clear that they were meant to last forever, after all, you pay a hefty price for every response, and even those who claimed they had few credits left or just wanted to send you/or you them their contact details turned out to be quite chatty and without limits what credits was concerned.
Next, we looked at the pictures of those women and it wasn't hard to trace most of them to America, Russia, or pictures of porn models dressed. We also found a lot of pictures that didn't match - the profile picture looked totally different than the larger picture inside the message, clearly two different women with one or two of the same attributes. Most fakes were easily identifiable by just looking a little closer at the picture and spotting the obvious - like American wall sockets, superwhite teeth, the build of the house, etc.
Also, the women didn't know how to refer to places, like saying downtown or State of Devon, for example. If you live in a place you don't say I saw you walking past me in London but you name the borough.
out of 3,361 messages B received we can say with absolute certainty that 57 of them were sent from real women - the rest were all fake! Bad fakes mostly. I mean why would supermodels use a site like that and contact an ugly, unwashed guy with bad teeth for sex - no, literally begging him for it?
So if you feel you have too much money and you want to have a bad cyber experience, please, go ahead, spend your money there - if not, go out in the world and talk to a real person...