I am filing this complaint to warn other businesses about ACCESS Newswire’s renewal and billing practices.
Our company entered into a prepaid, fixed-term Sales Order for a 12-press-release package running from 11/5/2024 to 11/4/2025, at a cost of $4,650. The Sales Order clearly stated a defined start and end date and did not reference automatic renewal.
Approximately 40 days after the contract term ended, ACCESS Newswire sent an invoice demanding immediate payment for a renewed annual term at a higher price of $5,115. This was the first time we were made aware that the agreement had allegedly auto-renewed.
When we disputed the charge, ACCESS Newswire asserted that:
The agreement auto-renewed without notice
The renewal price increase was valid
The full annual amount was immediately due
ACCESS Newswire pointed us to a separate, lengthy Terms and Conditions document—not the Sales Order itself—where auto-renewal language appears deep within the document. This auto-renewal provision was not clearly disclosed at the contract summary level and was not reinforced with a clear, advance renewal notice.
We immediately canceled the service upon learning of the renewal and did not intentionally use any services after the alleged renewal date. Despite this, ACCESS Newswire refused to void or prorate the invoice and explicitly stated they intended to “enforce the contract.”
ACCESS Newswire later attempted to justify the price increase by referencing a generalized email announcement, relying on internal “email open” tracking as proof of notice. However, the tracking data provided showed an automated or proxy-triggered “open” from a device configuration I do not use, further calling into question whether meaningful notice was ever received.
This experience represents the poorest customer service encounter I have had with a vendor in my career. Regardless of outcome, we will not do business with ACCESS Newswire again.
Based on further research, we discovered that many other companies report similar experiences involving auto-renewals, billing disputes, and enforcement via fine-print terms. We believe these practices are unfair, misleading, and inconsistent with reasonable expectations for B2B customer relationships.
Specifically Nicholas Yetman over there is HORRIBLE to work with.








