the Guardian Reviews 

Once a decent newspaper. Which allowed readers to comment on 90% of stories.

After several years of readers commenting that the story in the Guardian they had just read either wasn't true, contained glaring factual inaccuracies, or was biased to a ridiculous degree the Guardian quietly and stealthily did away with readers comments.

It's antisemitic and pitifully hypocritical. It criticises businesses that use offshore tax havens whilst using an offshore tax haven itself.

I cancelled my order for the print edition a while back. Now I never bother with the biased online version.

Never mind the contents of the publication. If you share your personal details, contributing to an article (without any remuneration), you are promptly called internationally by someone who obtained your data illegally. They have your name, telephone number and email. Who is leaking this info? A potential scam? An invasion of your privacy!

Fake News and not very intelligent journalist spouting hateful divisive propaganda. We should hold all media responsible for lying to WE THE PEOPLE, it has caused egregious harm to society.

It claims it has independent views however it’s very biased in Democratic favor. And I believe is the opinion of the writer rather than actually researching Facts.

MAGA all the way baby!!!! red wave in US and blue wave coming to Canada!!!

According to a Guardian journalist:

US people want a racist, misogynist, twice-impeached convicted felon that hawks hatred and retribution instead of Harris.

I'm just worried about the lack of insight of that journalist - how bad must the Democrats and Harris be if the above description is the preferred choice in US.

My suggestion is focus on the real story if you want to go into the gutter, or maybe you already live there.

Guardian is a biased rubbish read and the sooner you get off the internet with your constant begging for money so you can peddle your tripe further, the better.

Disgusting, useless, foul, liars, puppets, NPCS, pathetic.The level of hatred I feel towards these clowns is the level of hatred they put out on a daily basis. This will be a show review as I can't use the words I want to use without a ban.

Biased and pseudo science based articles. Pure twaddle for the most part.

Finally, for so long The Guardian was ignoring Trump’s divisive and hateful rhetoric and his true plan to be a fascist dictator from day one. I cancelled my paid subscription because of this. Only now considering re-subscribing but will wait a bit to see if you really do cover Trump honestly as the danger he is or go back to ignoring him and his brainwashed cult.

The Guardian was once a fairly honest left-leaning source of information. However over the last 20yrs it has gone full-on anti-British, anti-business and anti-conservative. What worries me the most is the fact that the Guardian is the most read newspaper in academia. Academics are teaching this unbalanced stuff to students.
The begging bit under their online articles refers to their "fearless journalism". There's absolutely nothing fearless about it anymore. It's so terrified of some minority interest groups and will never dare print anything even-handed or truthful about them.
In a nutshell the Guardian and its readers see themselves as the master race, entitled to Lord it over the rest of us. It's become predominantly full of opinion pieces containing ad-hominem attacks and a liberal use of the word "fascist". You've lost the argument when you feel the need to resort to such tactics.
P.S. their latest woke battlefield is Artificial Intelligence. Apparently it's making women's breasts bigger! It's probably some devious plan by the patriarchy to retain old gender roles by manipulating code. You just couldn't make this up.

It is far more biased towards privilege and the interests of the rich then many of the papers it likes to purport to being holier then though over every single issue . More censorship then the Daily Mail and less freedom of speech then many newspapers in China .
Today it ran a hatchet piece on Badenoch rubbishing her working class credentials .
It left the comments section open for it's favoured trolls to attack Badenoch . Yet day after day Starmer utters rubbish and they won't allow comments on these stories .
It seems to have a real hatred for independent self made women of colour like Badenoch and Patel . The Guardian has never had a ethnic minority or non public school type as editor . It also only lent Harris it's support after old Joe stepped aside.
They banned all of my comments only for stating the truth that Starmer was the son of a factory owner not a work man

Such a liberal piece of trash. I can never get through an entire article .. too bad.. it would be great if they wrote about both sides.. I’m going to block it

Comment is free and facts are sacred used to be the Guardians major selling point . However today neither selling point is true . The Guardian is no more then a Starmer controlled rag if you try to comment critically and factually on any of this self congratulatory little hypocrites behaviours . The comment get's ring fenced answered back and shadow banned , before you get the chance to answer back with more facts to back up a critical comment on our vile worst minister before they close the discussion thread . In addition there is no option or buttons to correct spelling mistakes , grammar or other type -oh's once a comment is sent .
They also don't allow down votes. Censorship at it's worst . Yet they still have the nerve to beg me to donate to their centrist censorious bias which protects entitled greedy politicians and other public sector dead weight , within the upper echelons of the low performance - high earner bracket .

I was very happy with reading the guardian. It has excellent journalism. However, its subscription department leaves a little to be designed. I pay annually, and somehow my login was not working for months. They reinstated my login, but failed to give me the months that they could see my login had not been working for which was at least half a year. So I felt ripped off. Considering I give guardian readership subs for many years, even when I wasn't reading hyper disappointed.

A biased and racist piece of trash, that is a waste of paper and ink, while not being worth anyone's money. Speaking from experience as an autistic person, it is a contributing factor as to why your children are likely to commit suicide, like in the suicide spikes of 2016. They only pretend to care about disabled people, while attacking them for their race, gender or sexual orientation.

Terrible…no shocking journalism. Investigative and informed? I don’t think so!

It’s “Climate change” in every weather event article. That is enough right there. Total crap this newsganda is.

I am noticing a pattern here with most of the reviews. As readers mature they realise how biased and left leaning the Guardian is.
The Guardian may be in-dependant from a funding perspective. That comment is misleading in itself as it mostly publishes left leaning ideology. And would like you to think that being independent is non biased.
The sad reality is that young and old lefties ( mostly young ) take these articles as the gospel, and then run with it spreading misinformation. Sadly only some grow up and realise how much misinformation and disinformation they have consumed through biased media like The Guardian and main stream media.
Being centrist or right wing is not evil but it is sure made out to be by these types of media outlets.
I mean who in their right mind doesn’t want peace and love in the world. And everyone to be treated equally.
Remember this quote “ There may be exceptions to the rules in life but you shouldn’t make rules for the exceptions”
Otherwise the majority has to change or suffer for the small minority, and that is wrong.

They obviously hold all my data to the point the can inform me I've read 18 of there articles in the last year. They then used that to justify asking for £144 a year.

Included a major direct misquote in an article. I would not have known if I didn’t watch the interview myself. This is not a reliable source of information and sadly makes me question previous content I have read in the past from this source. More effort should be made on persevering the accuracy of published information.