Weshort Reviews 6

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

3.7

While we don't verify specific claims because reviewers' opinions are their own, we may label reviews as "Verified" when we can confirm a business interaction took place. Read more

To protect platform integrity, every review on our platform—verified or not—is screened by our 24/7 automated software. This technology is designed to identify and remove content that breaches our guidelines, including reviews that are not based on a genuine experience. We recognise we may not catch everything, and you can flag anything you think we may have missed. Read more


Contact info

3.7

Average

TrustScore 3.5 out of 5

6 reviews

5-star
4-star
3-star
2-star
1-star

Replied to 50% of negative reviews

Typically replies within 2 weeks

How this company uses Trustpilot

See how their reviews and ratings are sourced, scored, and moderated.

Companies on Trustpilot aren't allowed to offer incentives or pay to hide reviews. Reviews are the opinions of individual users and not of Trustpilot. Read more

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

This site is completely unreliable

This site is completely unreliable. I paid for a weekly subscription and was charged again. I do not want this subscription. There is no payment method listed in my account, no visible payment history, and no clear record of how this charge was processed.

I also paid to watch a short film and was not allowed to watch it anyway. I am trying to delete my account, but the system keeps saying my password is invalid. I reset it and it still does not work. This is unacceptable.

There is no real customer support—only a contact form on their website. I wrote to them and never received any response. No transparency, no assistance, no accountability. Avoid.

2 March 2026
Unprompted review
Weshort logo

Reply from Weshort

Hello Luca,

we’re sorry to hear about your experience. What you describe does not reflect the service we aim to provide and may be related to a technical or account-specific issue.

Subscriptions and payments are normally visible and manageable from the user account or through the platform used for the purchase (such as app stores). If something did not appear correctly, we would be happy to investigate and clarify the situation.

Regarding the film access and password reset, these also sound like technical issues that our team can help resolve quickly once we can verify the account details.

Please contact us at support@weshort.com including the email associated with your account so we can review the charges, assist you with access, and help you close the account if requested.

We appreciate you bringing this to our attention and we remain available to resolve the matter as soon as possible.

— The WeShort Team

Rated 1 out of 5 stars

We are sincerely disappointed to report…

We are sincerely disappointed to report a very distressing experience with this distribution platform. It is particularly disheartening as we have supported it since its early days and genuinely believed in its mission to empower independent filmmakers.

Our films have been available on the platform since 2023. During the first year, we chose to offset our royalties through a marketing offer that promised to multiply their value by reinvesting them into promotional activity for films hosted on the platform. As a result, we did not experience the royalty payment process directly in that first year.

In 2024, we opted instead to receive our royalties. That is when the difficulties began.
The royalty statement (rendicontazione), due in January 2025, was not delivered on time — not a week or a month late, but only on 14 May 2025. On that same day, we promptly followed the platform’s instructions and issued an invoice with a due date of 31 May 2025, providing all required documentation correctly and on time.

Despite this, no payment has been received to date.

The distribution agreement itself clearly specifies the payment timeline, stating that the royalties shall be paid by the first week of January each year (in respect of royalties accrued throughout the previous year) unless otherwise agreed upon in writing between the Parties.
Yet, we have not received the royalties accrued for 2024, even after multiple reminders and extensions of good faith.

During this process, we also identified errors in the royalty estimates — one of which referred to a film that was not ours — and we immediately and politely reported it. We also noted that the royalties accrued for 2024 were inexplicably equal to those of 2023, despite the platform having raised its subscription costs. We accepted their explanation in good faith, choosing to trust rather than question.

However, the core issue remains: our royalties, due at the end of May 2025, remain unpaid.

After the due date passed, we had to follow up repeatedly — approximately once or twice per month — to request what was owed. The amount in question is modest, but that is precisely why we felt compelled to persist. Small sums, when multiplied across thousands of films, become significant.

Independent filmmakers should never be discouraged from claiming what is rightfully theirs. In the UK, there are dedicated bodies that assist filmmakers in recovering unpaid royalties and defending their distribution rights. To put this into perspective: if a single film generates even £30, and a platform hosts 2,000 titles, those “symbolic” amounts quickly add up.
It is not only unfair — it is immoral for others to profit from filmmakers’ work while returning only crumbs in exchange.

Throughout this ordeal, we have received three contradictory explanations from the same representative: one citing unspecified “technical issues,” another claiming the transfer had already been made (without proof), and the most recent, dated 30 September 2025, stating that the invoice had “just been paid.”
To this day, no payment has been received.

On Thursday, 23 October 2025, we were sent a cropped screenshot of a supposed transfer attempt. They claimed the bank transfer failed, despite our bank details being correct — and despite us regularly receiving payments into that same account. We even offered alternative solutions, including PayPal, to facilitate immediate payment. We later provided a second bank account, yet no funds have arrived.

We requested the removal of our films in early October 2025, and the platform has since taken them down. However, our films remained available for most of 2025 and therefore continued to accrue royalties throughout that period. Given the disheartening experience we have had in pursuing the royalties from 2024, we sadly do not expect the company to acknowledge or settle the royalties accrued in 2025 either.

We delayed making this statement, hoping the matter would be resolved promptly and professionally. Unfortunately, it has not been — and this has become the most disappointing distribution experience we have encountered to date.

We share this account not out of resentment, but out of duty.
If such treatment can be extended to a registered company, one can only imagine how easily first-time or independent filmmakers might be disregarded or taken advantage of.

We sincerely hope that by reporting our experience, we can encourage greater transparency, accountability, and fairness within the independent film distribution sector.

28 October 2025
Unprompted review
Show reviews in all languages. (6 reviews)

The Trustpilot Experience

Anyone can write a Trustpilot review. People who write reviews have ownership to edit or delete them at any time, and they’ll be displayed as long as an account is active.

Companies can ask for reviews via automatic invitations. Labeled Verified, they’re about genuine experiences.

Learn more about other kinds of reviews.

We use dedicated people and clever technology to safeguard our platform. Find out how we combat fake reviews.

Learn about Trustpilot’s review process.

Here are 8 tips for writing great reviews.

Verification can help ensure real people are writing the reviews you read on Trustpilot.

Offering incentives for reviews or asking for them selectively can bias the TrustScore, which goes against our guidelines.

Take a closer look