Userbenchmark Reviews 

Userbenchmark is a useless site for comparisons, providing what they believe to be "real-world" data. On the release of the AM5 socket processors they chose to write on how AMD CPUs would fall into obscurity in a similar way to their Radeon GPUs. Both claims turned out to be obviously false, with newer buyers preferring AMD GPUs due to Nvidia's AI focus. AMD CPUs have also been more reliable, and in general more performant than their Intel counterparts. Furthermore, Userbenchmark is under the belief that they are being targeted on this very website as a marketing stunt by those who would earn from their de-legitimisation. This is just tinfoil-hat behaviour from an extremely biased company.

Not a good way to see the better option because of their HEAVY bias towards Nvidia and Intel. They litterally say that you've been manipulated if you choose an AMD GPU over an NVIDIA GPU or just say that the INTEL CPU is great but on the AMD CPU they say it's meh ok and that the better option is always intel. The reason behind this might be because they have shares over at Intel an Nvidia.

Not a factual benchmark site but an Anti-AMD site trying to push their narrative. Paywalling the bechmark tool when it was always free in the past.

before UserBenchmarks was a harmless meme, they're bias in testing and reviews were known, but people didnt really care. However recently he's plastered his site with messages claiming that the negative reviews are a 'smear campaign', and that everyone who disagrees with him is a 'marketing shill', its beyond crazy, and its the words of someone delusional beyond saving.

Whats worse is that his bias is not limited just to the written reviews, but is directly present in the scores, which thanks to affected results are completely useless as a point of reference. For example, when multi-core started becomming more mainstream, he limited multicore performance to just 2% of a CPU's score, claiming that you never need more than 2 cores for most tasks anyways. Similar to this he likes to measure something called EFps (effective FPS), which is a metric that only he can measure apparently, and something he uses to justify switching numbers around to suit his narative.

His bias is present all the way through the site, on almost all AMD reviews he will rave about how everyone else on twitter and reddit is wrong and a marketing shill, and likes to position himself as the only non shill trying to warn you of the horrible AMD. He often puts Intels recent failures down to 'poor marketing', refusing to acknowledge any of the issues, including nothing about the corrosion issues that plagued the 1300 and 1400k series.

The easiest way to see it is this: Either EVERYONE who ever praises AMD for their products is a paid shill, and everyone who talks bad about his website is part of a coordinated smear campaign (this includes the official Intel subreddit that now discredit him too) or userbenchmarks is delusional and borderline insane with his hatred of anything AMD related.

Zero credibility, they're heavily biased against AMD and wont give information based on fact but rather on emotion. Do not take anything they say at face value.

I don't understand how it is so hard to drop your personal preferences (in this case, hatred towards AMD) and make an actual functional site.

This site is misleading if you see this review, better go check actual benchmark youtubers like LTT, gamers nexus

Incredibly innacurate with heavy bias. It then goes on to discredit anyone who knows anything about what they're talking about by saying they have a bad reputation from corporate bot accounts. Terrible site.

This is the site i keep coming back to. No affiliate links, and the crap scoring on here is mainly due to botfarms downvoting.

The place is clean, simple and lists the facts - and only the facts. Apparently that doesn’t sit well with some people.

I’ve used userbenchmarks for years and always found that they’re right on the money when it comes to performance.

Still heavily biased... but now also trying to plaster it's own website with claims that it's low trustpilot score is due to a "coordinated attack". That was the final drop in the bucket that made me want to write a review. I'd love it if this site could become useful, but as it stands it's just kinda terrible for comparing anything.

They are so biased, while declaring that they are not. They hate AMD, praise NVidia and Intel, and constantly try to explain why no one likes Userbenchmark. Annoying brats. I am pretty sure it is run by a kid who was picked on in high school.

Someone terrible is behind this website, writing insulting and nonsensical statements attacking users and those seeking the truth.

Owners of this site clearly have favorite brands which they will always give a favorable review to, and hated brands they will never give a good review, even if the price, performance, and reliability of that product is better.

Doesnt seem very legit, even on an intel cpu they put "Although Ryzen 7000 has weaker multi-core, weaker single-core" that is in a completly different sentence for no reason.

VERY Biased site, with highly UNRELIABLE data and comparisons. Misleads many new builders, sadly. They'll do literally anything to avoid praising AMD for literally anything. It's honestly hilarious that they think they're still relevant. Some years back, the owner of the site decided to be a fanboy instead of being objective. Look ANYWHERE else for hardware comparisons and you're likely to get better and more reliable info.

good for comparing intel to intel but that's about it due to bias

"The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts."

Lots of mis-information on the site, no longer reputable.

They love bouncing up in down on intel dih