Wikipedia Reviews 

It is very unfair to lock peoples pages as character assassinations w/o any proof for years on end.
Even with thousands protesting it...
I lost all respect for this platform...

I have used wikipedia for a very long time and starting witnessing incorrect information, misinformation, and outright lies. Very disappointing as I did contribute to it. There is still a limited use, but I would use other sources to verify. It is definitely not acceptable for research.

Wikipedia is an absolute joke. It is funded primarily by millionaires and billionaires who get exclusive editing rights to controversial content. Pull the wool out of your eyes people! Wikipedia is an extension of main stream media propaganda!

Wikipedia once was and still is for some primarily non political articles a very good resource for getting basic knowledge about certain events and ideas quickly and moderately reliably. however it has unfortunately in recent years become overrun by far left propaganda trying to push pro globalist/ communist cultural Marxist interpretations about recent and historical events e.g. the Holodomor, the 2015 migrant wave, Recent US politics etc whilst silencing neutral, factual voices.

Its the best assistant for everyone interested in knowing more about factual information in so many subjects. I have always kept Wikipedia in my bookmarks and spend good time in reading its insightful articles everyday.

Wikipedia is an amazing information platform, It really helps in get information and increase my IQ.

No longer a trusted source. Now shows a strong political bias. From co-founder Larry Sanger in story Washington Times. 2/24/2021.

I don't know why Trustpilot reviewers are just so miserable, because, let's face it, we all rely on Wikipedia for information. Many people couldn't think of a world without it. It's like having your own encyclopedia!

Huge downfall in the company in recent years. Lots of fake information and when corrected corrupt admins come for your neck.

Seems uninterested in people and do not reflect the truth.

Lost its credibility and is hugely politically influenced.

All the information on it came from people who wrote about them self so they can say any thing not true also the information from history came from bad resource which most false and not true , they should do research better about about what they writing , misleading people not a nice thing to do on website so don’t relay on this site at all, and go to check another resource better that this one

Wikipedia was once a respectable website. I used to donate every year. NO MORE.
They have a bunch of far-left propagandists writing the content of entries, perfectly fine with damning anyone or any organization they don't like, with the label of white supremacy.
The contributors are watering down the meaning of this label by applying it to everything they don't like. It's getting real old, and it makes once-respectable sites like Wikipedia a COMPLETE joke.
They are actively participating in the destruction of free speech.

They lie, don't read politics or history. They turn all upside down. Wikipedia embellish war criminals and Nazi!
They lie about World War 2. It's half truth, half lie. Wikipedia absolutely could not care less about truth and facts.
They blame innocent terribly suffering people of USSR. They said that Russian people invaded with Hitter together the Europe! Its horror! 22 million Russian people died from Germans Nazi. Hitler bombed unprepared sleeping USSR. at 4 am!
Nazis put knives in pregnant women's wombs and killed the babies, burned women and children alive, cut on halves children in front of mothers, and mothers in front of children! They burnt whole villages alive together. The horror Russian people suffered unbelievable. This nation still cries in pain. But what we read on Wikipedia? They say its USSR with Hitler together invaded Europe! This is most horrendous words they could say! It is because 22 million of Soviets solders and innocent people died the Europe and Europeans are still alive and live in peace!
Where is gratitude? Where is truth and dignity?

Even simplest biography dates and events of world famous opera singers they managed to write the wrong way. I watched on tv how the world famous opera singers said to their audience why there is wrong information on Wikipedia about them. Singers answered that they tried to correct it by contacting to the staff of Wikipedia but received arrogant answer from them that Wikipedia knows better their life events than they themselves! and after that they ignored singers completely! It's outrageous! Singers even offered to write the article themselves! But they were told that they cannot write about themselves. So for Wikipedia its ok to lie but people they write about are not allowed to correct them! There are still lies and wrong information on Wikipedia!

So this is the time I understood that managers and owners of Wikipedia are not interested in truth and facts.
They are interested in satisfying their own super egos, pride, arrogance and self-righteousness!

Hundreds of millions of people who were watching tv now know that Wikipedia lie and they should not trust Wikipedia any more. I bet they all stopped reading articles on Wikipedia forever.
I used to love Wikipedia in the beginning but now all I see is lying, incorrect, arrogant, dishonest, ignorant, self righteous people there! They got tiny power over people and events.
Now their minds and hearts rot from abuse of this tiny power!
Don't read them. There are unprofessional people who write the articles.

I once helped them with 20 pounds so they told me that now I can write any article I wish! So it's not about professionalism but as always about money!

I used to love wiki and would use it as a main source of info and donated several times. No longer. Wiki has become about as accurate as fact checkers on facebook and become about as reliable in searching out truths as Snopes. Which is to say very very unreliable. Wiki has swung so far left that it doesn't even bother trying to hide its bias. They will never get another click from me.

Wikipedia gives inaccurate and misleading reviews of people, they are a dishonest corporation.

I use it everyday as most do. Please donate to them as they will not b up and running if we don’t
Amazing resource
My students use it all the time
Even if u are only giving a few dollars, it truly helps them
They r nonprofit

Best website to gain knowledge on everything.

Really unreliable. I am shocked to be honest. i always knew that you can't use Wikipedia for research purposes, for obvious reasons. However i have never thought that an obvious false information is so hard to change. I just sent a request and i almost got blocked by a hyper sensitive egoistic author. Wikipedia does not offer any solution to that. NEVER USE IT

[This review pertains to the English Wikipedia]

Sometimes, there's vandalism, but it's often quickly reverted.

Wikipedia isn't the disinformation pit people still claim it is, and articles have citations in them.

------------------------------------------------

Note: Some of the reviews on this page are harmful, such as:
+ the one from the person who edited a page on their corporation (which is discouraged per WP:COIEDIT)
+ the one that parrots claims of fraud in the 2020 election (ironically, without any evidence)
+ the 1-star review complaining about the "Dome of the Rock" article not listing it as a mosque
   - even though it isn't even a mosque
   - not understanding that the blue lock
      ~ means only registered accounts 30+d old and with 500+ edits can edit the article
      ~ is used to mitigate that same vandalism everyone complains about
+ the second review complaining about how editing with a conflict of interest on Wikipedia (e.g. promoting your own corporation on Wikipedia) is frowned upon
+ the review writing the site off as propaganda without evidence
+ the *many* ironic reviews claiming the site is all lies, (you guessed it) with no elaboration or evidence to their claims
+ the review writing the George Floyd 'protests' off as left-wing lies, and in the same vein, all of the other politically motivated reviews claiming that it's all liberal bias
+ the many reviews that don't account for the fact that vandalism is usually reverted quickly
+ the review claiming right-wing bias
+ "Admins ban anyone who looks at any pages" (this isn't how Wikipedia works at all, as they can't see who's looking at a page)