DO NOT USE this is an illegal business
On Monday, the 29th of July 2024 FCFCOA orders were made for a valuation service as part of a divorce, on the 27th of August I made payment for the valuation which I have not received a receipt confirming the transaction. Furthermore, I was quoted a cost of $850 but was charged $1127.50.
Upon reviewing the valuation document eventually provided to lawyers after a lengthy period of time, we discovered several troubling irregularities concerning the valuer involved. The two most concerning ones that have come to our attention are:
The valuer operates under two different names.
Uses a fraudulent Australian Business Number.
One company name that is registered in the United States, which further raises suspicion of fraudulent activity.
Disturbingly, most FCFCOA guidelines have not been met.
Font sizes and half used pages along with two pages of a resume an additional two pages of pictures along with three pages of the letter form lawyers out lining the FCFCOA instructions to increase the document size but still left the document short of the requirements.
The statement “the valuation is current as at the day of the valuation only” is troublingly used in the document.
Sections of the property have been omitted from the valuation. (bedrooms, attic storage, study, WIR)
A certain section of the report is blatantly copied from the NAB website. Document - NAB Quarterly Australian Residential Property Survey Q2 2024 | Business Research and Insights
Comparisons, two are smaller properties, two have incorrect sale prices and all are outdated by months.
Risk analysis is grossly outdated to include “COVID -19” with note at the bottom of page rendering the valuation and SWAT analysis invalid.
Redactions have been done by hand and then re-scanned.
Critical sections for certification date and time are missing, which is highly unprofessional and fraudulent.
Search criteria used in the property report predate federal court orders made 29th of July 2024 and valuer selection the 6th of Aug 2024.
These actions strongly indicate deceptive and unethical practices by this "valuation company".
An investigation be launched by the department of fair trading to address these serious issues involving illegal and unethical conduct to prevented from defrauding the public further. the DOFT unfortunately does not possess the ability to take action against people in illegal businesses.
Furthermore, multiple attempts to recover funds by bank have been unsuccessful.







